Customers can preserve institutional knowledge and operational stability by retaining key employees in their current roles.
Depending on airline size, preserving critical staff within their home functions rather than detaching them for on‑site manufacturer duties safeguards institutional knowledge and ensures uninterrupted business operations.

Removing key personnel from their primary roles—or assigning them additional delivery responsibilities—creates measurable operational risk. Aircraft delivery support is a full‑time activity that requires real‑time decision making; delays or suboptimal decisions can extend delivery schedules by days or even weeks.
Many carriers assign promising, developmental employees to manufacturer sites, which is an excellent growth opportunity. However, it is incumbent upon the carrier to ensure those individuals are fully equipped to make high‑stakes decisions. Engaging the AEAI team in an advisory capacity preserves the developmental value of the assignment while providing the representative with immediate access to subject‑matter expertise and institutional knowledge. This dual approach improves decision quality, accelerates issue resolution, and reduces schedule risk.
For example, decisions to accept or reject a non‑conformance must be guided by a “what is right for the airplane” philosophy. In practice, unnecessary rework can propagate additional defects and compound schedule and cost impacts. AEAI brings proven alternatives within the delivery commitments process that protect the airline’s long‑term interests without driving avoidable rework.
Recommendation: adopt an advisory engagement with AEAI to augment on‑site personnel. This preserves business continuity at the carrier, strengthens decision making at the point of delivery, and minimizes both schedule and lifecycle risk.